急求一份中国在模拟联合国大会上的英文发言稿关于环境保护节能减排主要方面是中国要求发达国家给予技术和资金的援助.中国只要有技术,就走低污染低耗能的发展道路.主要针对发达国

Question

急求一份中国在模拟联合国大会上的英文发言稿 关于环境保护 节能减排
主要方面是 中国要求发达国家给予技术和资金的援助.
中国只要有技术,就走低污染低耗能的发展道路.
主要针对发达国家 希望发达国家与中国共同承担主要减排责任
最好是英文成稿 小弟就这么点分 不超过2分钟

Answer 1

Environmental protection in China:the role of law
China’s growing rule of law and public environmental awareness show promising initial signs of success.But will it be too little,too late?Alex Wang investigates."For China,the challenges of using the law for environmental protection are formidable.Unlike the US with its long history and culture of using law and the courts,China essentially began in 1979 to rebuild anew a legal system that had been entirely dismantled in the previous few decades."
In a rural village,set on the edges of a narrow mountain valley,a group of farmers go to court seeking relief from industrial pollution that has threatened their health and destroyed the crops that are the basis of their livelihoods.The defendants are two local factories that use a primitive industrial process to reduce copper ore.The process generates massive amounts of smoke and stench that decimate much of the surrounding forests and crops and cause local residents chronic headaches and coughing.The farmers ask for compensation and a court order halting the pollution.The court refuses to order a stop to the polluting activities because such an order would “blot out two great mining and manufacturing enterprises,destroy half of the taxable values of a county … and deprive thousands of working people of their homes and livelihood.”
This is a story that is all too familiar in China,reflecting the persistent distance between environmental degradation and a legal system struggling to keep up with a rapidly changing economy.This particular story,however,does not come from China at all.Rather,it is the 1904 US case of Madison v.Ducktown Sulphur from the state of Tennessee.As in China today,the industrial revolution in the United States brought with it increasing harm to the public from pollution and greater environmental conflict.In the early part of the 20th century,the US legal system was not up to the task and the country muddled through decades of inadequate environmental regulation and often unsatisfactory court decisions.It was not until the 1970s that the US passed a series of robust environmental laws and opened the door to a generation of environmental advocates who would use law and the courts to improve the environment.
There is some comfort in knowing that developed countries like the US,Japan and England were able to reverse decades of environmental degradation.The difficulty is that China’s environmental problems are moving faster and on a larger scale than anything the world has ever seen before.
The Chinese context