早教吧作业答案频道 -->英语-->
作文批改!给点建议!Itisrightthatuniversitygraduatesshouldearnhighersalarythanlesswell-educatedmembers.Towhatextenddoyouagreeordisagree?正文:Thereismuchdebatesurroundingtheissueofuniversitygraduatesbeingpaidm
题目详情
作文批改!给点建议!
It is right that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
正文:There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose to learn,and eventually apply their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
It is right that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
正文:There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose to learn,and eventually apply their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
▼优质解答
答案和解析
应该说你很会考试,至少在模式上,所以文章看起来中规中矩.文章切题,但第一段比较模式化,关键是第三段论证的很仓促,不令人信服,论证清楚才是至少得到6分的基础,另外要稍微加大难度单词和复杂句式的添加.多看看范文,掌握高分作文的特点也很重要!此文是5.5分
There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose /supposedto learn,and eventually apply/ 这个单词比较重复,可以改成理论联系实际 link theory to practice their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely/simply based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose /supposedto learn,and eventually apply/ 这个单词比较重复,可以改成理论联系实际 link theory to practice their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely/simply based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
看了作文批改!给点建议!Itisr...的网友还看了以下:
李老师批改作业,第一节课批了1/3,如果再批8本,就批完全班的一半.全班共有作业40本, 2020-04-27 …
某批发商用1000元购10箱肥皂,每箱50块,准备以一定的价格按箱批发,如果每块肥皂以2.5元的价 2020-06-18 …
某批发商用1000元购10箱肥皂,每箱50块,准备以一定的价格按箱批发,如果每块肥皂以2.5元的价 2020-06-18 …
某批发商用1000元购10箱肥皂,每箱50块,准备以一定的价格按箱批发,如果每块肥皂以2.5元的价 2020-06-18 …
如何评价老师批改小学的作文,评价老师批改作文是否正确 2020-06-22 …
某汽车配件厂生产一批圆批的橡胶垫,从中抽取6件进行检验,比标准直径长的毫米数记作正数,比标准直径短 2020-06-24 …
某汽车配件厂生产一批圆批的橡胶垫,从中抽取6件进行检验,比标准直径长的毫米数记作正数,比标准直径短 2020-07-11 …
某汽车配件厂生产一批圆批的橡胶垫,从中抽取6件进行检验,比标准直径长的毫米数记作正数,比标准直径短 2020-07-15 …
华老师连续批改作业,每批改20份作业由于精力降低批改速度会下降10%,华老师批改40份作业需要17 2020-07-18 …
怎么自己检查作文?(广告者滚)RT……现在没人批改我的作文了只好自批什么方法能够自己批改作文?自己检 2020-11-26 …