早教吧作业答案频道 -->英语-->
07年英语考研中的TEXT1中24题为什么C不对Ericssonandhiscolleaguesbelievethat[A]talentisadominatingfactorforprofessionalsuccess.[B]biographicaldataprovidethekeytoexcellentperformance.[C]theroleoftalenttendstobeo
题目详情
07年英语考研中的TEXT1中24题为什么C不对
Ericsson and his colleagues believe that
[A] talent is a dominating factor for professional success.
[B] biographical data provide the key to excellent performance.
[C] the role of talent tends to be overlooked.
[D] high achievers owe their success mostly to nurture.
为什么C 不对?请帮忙分析一下
附上全文:If you were to examine the birth certificates of every soccer player in 2006’s World Cup tournament, you would most likely find a noteworthy quirk: elite soccer players are more likely to have been born in the earlier months of the year than in the late months. If you then examined the European national youth teams that feed the World Cup and professional ranks, you would find this strange phenomenon to be ever more pronounced.
What might account for this strange phenomenon? Here are a few guesses: a) certain astrological signs confer superior soccer skills; b) winter born babies tend to have higher oxygen capacity, which increases soccer stamina; c) soccer-mad parents are more likely to conceive children in springtime, at the annual peak of soccer mania; d) none of the above.
Anders Ericsson, a 58-year-old psychology professor at Florida State University, says he believes strongly in “none of the above.” Ericsson grew up in Sweden, and studied nuclear engineering until he realized he would have more opportunity to conduct his own research if he switched to psychology. His first experiment, nearly 30 years ago, involved memory: training a person to hear and then repeat a random series of numbers. “With the first subject, after about 20 hours of training, his digit span had risen from 7 to 20,” Ericsson recalls. “He kept improving, and after about 200 hours of training he had risen to over 80 numbers.”
This success, coupled with later research showing that memory itself is not genetically determined, led Ericsson to conclude that the act of memorizing is more of a cognitive exercise than an intuitive one. In other words, whatever inborn differences two people may exhibit in their abilities to memorize, those differences are swamped by how well each person “encodes” the information. And the best way to learn how to encode information meaningfully, Ericsson determined, was a process known as deliberate practice. Deliberate practice entails more than simply repeating a task. Rather, it involves setting specific goals, obtaining immediate feedback and concentrating as much on technique as on outcome.
Ericsson and his colleagues have thus taken to studying expert performers in a wide range of pursuits, including soccer. They gather all the data they can, not just performance statistics and biographical details but also the results of their own laboratory experiments with high achievers. Their work makes a rather startling assertion: the trait we commonly call talent is highly overrated. Or, put another way, expert performers – whether in memory or surgery, ballet or computer programming – are nearly always made, not born.
Ericsson and his colleagues believe that
[A] talent is a dominating factor for professional success.
[B] biographical data provide the key to excellent performance.
[C] the role of talent tends to be overlooked.
[D] high achievers owe their success mostly to nurture.
为什么C 不对?请帮忙分析一下
附上全文:If you were to examine the birth certificates of every soccer player in 2006’s World Cup tournament, you would most likely find a noteworthy quirk: elite soccer players are more likely to have been born in the earlier months of the year than in the late months. If you then examined the European national youth teams that feed the World Cup and professional ranks, you would find this strange phenomenon to be ever more pronounced.
What might account for this strange phenomenon? Here are a few guesses: a) certain astrological signs confer superior soccer skills; b) winter born babies tend to have higher oxygen capacity, which increases soccer stamina; c) soccer-mad parents are more likely to conceive children in springtime, at the annual peak of soccer mania; d) none of the above.
Anders Ericsson, a 58-year-old psychology professor at Florida State University, says he believes strongly in “none of the above.” Ericsson grew up in Sweden, and studied nuclear engineering until he realized he would have more opportunity to conduct his own research if he switched to psychology. His first experiment, nearly 30 years ago, involved memory: training a person to hear and then repeat a random series of numbers. “With the first subject, after about 20 hours of training, his digit span had risen from 7 to 20,” Ericsson recalls. “He kept improving, and after about 200 hours of training he had risen to over 80 numbers.”
This success, coupled with later research showing that memory itself is not genetically determined, led Ericsson to conclude that the act of memorizing is more of a cognitive exercise than an intuitive one. In other words, whatever inborn differences two people may exhibit in their abilities to memorize, those differences are swamped by how well each person “encodes” the information. And the best way to learn how to encode information meaningfully, Ericsson determined, was a process known as deliberate practice. Deliberate practice entails more than simply repeating a task. Rather, it involves setting specific goals, obtaining immediate feedback and concentrating as much on technique as on outcome.
Ericsson and his colleagues have thus taken to studying expert performers in a wide range of pursuits, including soccer. They gather all the data they can, not just performance statistics and biographical details but also the results of their own laboratory experiments with high achievers. Their work makes a rather startling assertion: the trait we commonly call talent is highly overrated. Or, put another way, expert performers – whether in memory or surgery, ballet or computer programming – are nearly always made, not born.
▼优质解答
答案和解析
应该选择D,译文:取得高成就的人将他们的成功归因于后天的培养.文章的最后一句是全文的结论,D项的high achievers对应expert performers,owe their success mostly to nurture对应are nearly always made.C项混淆了overlooked(忽略了)与原文的highly overrated(高估)一词
看了 07年英语考研中的TEXT1...的网友还看了以下:
可以参考的公式是:s[1]=a[1];s[n]=s[n-1]>=0?s[n-1]+a[n]:a[n 2020-05-14 …
以下关于C/S结构和B/S结构特点的说法中不正确的是(50)。A.C/S结构的效率高B.C/S结构的 2020-05-26 …
原油主要由( )元素组成。A.C,H,S,NB.C,O,Ni,SC.H,O,Fe,SD.S,0,Ni 2020-05-31 …
有短周期的三种元素x,y,z,已知x和y同周期,y和z同族.又知三元素最外层电子数之和为14,而质 2020-06-05 …
各项都为正数的等比数列{an},前n项和为A,前n项的积为B,前n项的倒数为C求证:各项都为正数的 2020-07-30 …
有关C语言char*s[]={"first","second","third"};printf(" 2020-07-30 …
公式难题,abcdefgn分别为不等的数值.a+b+n=?a+c+n=?a+d+n=?……………… 2020-08-04 …
a,b,c,d都是正实数S=a/(a+b+d)+b/(b+c+d)+c/(c+b+d)+d/(d+a 2020-11-10 …
大学本科线性代数提问A是n*s矩阵,B是s*n矩阵,(AB)X=0与BX=0同解,证明r(AB)=r 2020-11-18 …
公式难题...abcdefgn分别为不等的数值.a+b+n=?a+c+n=?a+d+n=?…………… 2020-11-28 …