求韩礼德halliday的语域理论registertheory的分析，解释语场field、语旨tenor、语式mode三方面。论文中用，要求全英文，字数一千字以上，三方面要分段介绍。拜托了！我不知道从哪里能找到，

Question

求韩礼德halliday的语域理论register theory的分析，解释语场field、语旨tenor、语式mode三方面。论文中用，要求全英文，字数一千字以上，三方面要分段介绍。 拜托了！我不知道从哪里能找到，知网没账号，其他的都不是英文的，拜托了！！！

Answer 1

Field of DiscourseEverything we say relates to a particular situation; words are not uttered independently of the context or situation. One of the determinants of the discourse is a social activity, already referred to as “field of discourse”. The actual term “field of discourse” is referred to and explained by Halliday in several ways, out of which one is presented below. the social action: that which is ‘going on’, and has recognizable meaning in the social system; typically a complex of acts in some ordered configuration, and in which the text is playing some part, and including “subject-matter” as one special aspect (ibid: 142-3). This definition of field given by Halliday implies that there is more to the field of discourse than just the subject matter. Hence, a broader concept should be kept in mind – the one that is equally attentive to the affair being talked over and factors forming the communicative situation. That is to say field of discourse concerns not only “what we are talking about”—the subject matter that the actual chatgroup focuses on , but also concerns “what we are doing”, or “what is going on”, within which that language is playing a part (ibid: 221-2). For example, in a discussion about a game of football, the social action is the discussion and the verbal interaction among the participants is the whole of this social action. “What is going on” is the discussion, and “what we are talking about” is the game itself. Tenor of Discourse Tenor, the second of the three situational determinants, carries the information on “who are taking part” (Halliday 1978: 189). In Halliday’s understanding，tenor of discourse results from the speech communication and reflects the relationship, contact and attachment among members (ibid: 33). The social relations between the members are usually reflected in the social status of power and solidarity. Mode of Discourse In linguistic terms, “mode” refers to either a medium of communication (spoken/written) or a rhetorical channel (Halliday 1978: 222) that one decides to use. They form a special relationship in that the former predetermines the latter and the latter is an indicator of the former. Thus mode of discourse answers the question “how” the communication is carried out and makes the third situational determinant of the discourse. Halliday’s semiotic structure of the situation stresses that it is only through mode that field and tenor become operational.