AGermantaxi-driver,FranzBussman,recentlyfoundabrother(whowasthoughttohavebeenkilled)twentyyearsbefore.这句话可以改成下面这样吗?AGermantaxi-driver,FranzBussman,recentlyfoundabrother(whowasthoughtthathadbeenk

Question

A German taxi-driver,Franz Bussman ,recently found a brother (who was thought to have been killed ) twenty years before.
这句话可以改成下面这样吗?
A German taxi-driver,Franz Bussman ,recently found a brother (who was thought that had been killed ) twenty years before.

Answer 1

改句有误,改后that不能代替brother作后面从句的主语,从而使从句缺少主语.
1、句子成分
1)主句成分
A German taxi-driver 主语
Franz Bussman 同位语
recently found a brother 状语 谓语 宾语
2）从句成分
who was ..twenty years before 定语从句,修饰主句先行词brother
2、例句分析
1）例1中的brother是后面who引导从句的先行词,who was thought=brother was thought,从句谓语动词thought的宾语是brother.不定式to have done,是thought的宾语补足语.
即 sb was thought to have been done的格式
主动语态为 thought sb to have done
2）例2的句子,可以分两种方法去理解
A.that 在从句中担当成分 代指brother作从句主语,that=brother
who was thought that had been...这样把brother 代入句中看的话,就成了：
brother was thought (that)brother had been..的形式
造成句意重复,brother不能当thought宾语的同时,又担当从句的主语,也就是说thought如果后面接双宾语的话,这两个宾语应该不是同一个名词,即不是同一个brother.
B.that 在从句中不担当成分 只起连接作用,that只为从属连词,可省略但没省.
who was thought that had been ...
=brother was thought that ( )had been 从句中,()处缺少宾语从句的主语